|
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. |
| Additional information: |
| C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the assessment scale. Feel free to make short comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-Importance on the assessment scale. |
|
I am performing a cleanup of the article by fixing grammatical errors, rewording wordy and poorly organized sentences and citing some references. I'm also adding an Applications section to the article to expand it. Soloxide (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- That's a good idea and a commendable ambition. It's a very good article but it does need a lot of work! Dr Roots (talk) 13:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Early history of security by design
This section currently cites Multics as the first system designed to be secure from the start. I seriously wonder what the IBM people would say about this. Dr Roots (talk) 13:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I would appreciate if anyone could lend a hand in fleshing out the MBTA vs. Anderson case. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
|