User talk:Mabdul.html |
| | | ca | | | de | | | en | | | es | | | fr | | | it | | | nl | | | no | | | pl | | | pt | | | ru | | | ro | | | fi | | | sv | | | tr | | | vo | | |
| |  |
About WP:WTAF on Comparison of usenet newsreaders
Hi! On this page: Comparison of usenet newsreaders you have removed all records whose software names were red (ie not linked to a valid article). While noble, i'm not sure how valid your reasoning is. Isn't the point of having a comparison so that you can compare different newsreaders and select the one that suits your needs? Then, I ask, why remove a lot of useful information? The idea behind WP:WTAF is that useless lists with unlinked keywords are prevented; not to cripple a perfectly good article. If anything, IMO you should have edited the red links to point not to internal wiki pages but to their external websites. --Styck (talk) 13:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Table
Resolved.I need help! The question is described on the help desk here: [1]
| Gecko | WebKit | KHTML | Presto | Prince XML | Amaya | Adobe SVG Viewer | Batik | DENG | Renesis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVG | 1.1 | Tiny (SVGT) | Partial | Partial | Partial | 8.0 | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | |
| Basic (SVGB) | Partial | Partial | Partial | Mostly | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | |||
| Full | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Partial | Mostly | Partial | Partial | |||
| 1.2 | Tiny | No | No | No | Partial - 9.5a | ? | ? | No | Partial | ? | Partial | ||
| sXBL | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | |||
| XBL 2.0 | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
Table
Sorry I couldn't find a solution. You can shrink it by putting padding: 0; into the style but you still can't control the width. x42bn6 Talk Mess 23:22, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Changing the width works fine here on Firefox; though, there's no way to get it below 2px wide as there's a left and right border that cannot be removed. Also, you have to remember that padding: 1px; is the same as setting a padding of 1px in every direction. So you get a total width of 3px (width+padding) for the background color and an additional width of 2px for the border, meaning you get a border that actually is 5px. Note that, while you can't change the width of or remove the border you can change the color of the right one, for example border-right: red; works. --Execvator (talk) 16:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Wrong kind of slash
Hi; you used the wrong kind of slash in this edit; it broke the template. Be sure to use the forward slash "/" rather than the backslash "\" when using the same ref in multiple places. Whistling42 (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- thanks; i made it not by copy and paste and sometmes there are msitakes if i didn't rev my own edit :rolleyes: Mabdul (talk) 00:42, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
khtml -> webkit presumption(s)
Your edit in the graphics comparison makes false presumptions, imho. You can't take any khtml features and say webkit gets them automatically. khtml uses "KParts", part of KDE for image rendering anyways. I think apple did NOT port that. Also, for a long time khtml supported more selectors (correctly) than webkit, as their codebases are not identical. So I wouldn't make presumptions based on the "inheritance" unless that feature is part of khtml (not any other part of kde) and was in before the webkit fork. This points to the issue that one of the tables lists "khtml" instead of "kparts". This example shows (imho) that KParts is clearer. --Grey (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
note to my own
Gopher Template
Nice work on the gopher template, I've mentioned it on the Gopher mailing list in the hope that it will motivate some of the subscribers to come and create articles for some of the various bits of Gopher software that currently do not have articles here. --Thefrood (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- thankyou I subscribe the list and in a few days i will post some mails... mabdul 0=* 20:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
BitTorrent client
Thanks for taking the initiative to help with the article. That comparison chart is a great split. Look forward to building this with you and the rest of the editors. XF Law talk at me 03:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- I saw you removed the comparison link that we (you) created. Is that in the template? Hate for that hard work to go unappreciated. XF Law talk at me 11:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
-
- Replied at talk page. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 18:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Replied again. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 05:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
-
Proposed deletion of ELinks
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ELinks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 23:05, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
IE7 should be in Historical Web Browsers table because it runs on WinXP
IE7 should be in Historical Web Browsers table because it runs on WinXP, the "Operating system support" table is supposed to be referring to the most recent version of the said OS at this moment in time, in this case--Windows Vista. Therefore without placing an IE7 row in the Historical table you are missing valuable information.Spitfire19 (Talk) 19:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- so, IE7 would only be placed on the list after IE8 is released (¬ beta)?
Comparison of BitTorrent Clients
Hi,
Splitting the comparison section back out of BitTorrent client was a bad idea, and unfortunately not one which I caught in time. because of this, for the last six weeks editors have been working on what is now a useless stub (BitTorrent client, which says absolutely nothing except "A BitTorrent client is a program used for accessing BitTorrent") and a comparison which has moved from Comparison of BitTorrent clients to BitTorrent client and now to Comparison of BitTorrent Clients (note the wrong capitalisation on the current title). This really needs to be re-consolidated with the article on clients themselves, as there is very little reason for having a standalone article on that subject - there simply isn't much to say. I'd appreciate it if you could see what you could do on that front. I was about to just revert the lot to the version at the start of October (which would properly preserve the now-mangled page history) but if this can be done elegantly that would be better. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 18:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've now crudely re-merged the latest verson of both articles, and will move the whole thing to the comparison page. If you then want to split out an overview of what a BitTorrent client is from there (not something I think is really worth doing) then this can be done without leaving a significant amount of edit history in the wrong article. Give me a shout if you have any questions. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Template:SVGSeries edits
Please see WP:R#NOTBROKEN. There is no point in piping links which work via redirects: doing so simply increases the size of the template code. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Acid Tests
Sorry, I didn't notice it there...
Nonagonal Spider (talk) 04:30, 3 December 2008 (UTC)